We've launched the 25th Anniversary edition of the Digital Leadership Report, the world's largest and longest-running survey of senior technology decision-makers.

Harvey Nash is a global leader among technology recruiting firms. Our laser-focused talent acquisition process builds tomorrow's future by putting top tech talent in your hands.

If you're looking to secure your next role or make your next best hire, we'd love to help. Get in touch to speak with one of our consultants today

Connecting companies with high-impact technology talent to fuel innovation and digital growth.

At Harvey Nash Canada, we specialize in building high-performing technology and digital teams. With over 30 years dedicated exclusively to the tech sector, we bring unmatched industry insight, a trusted talent network, and a proven ability to deliver.Our deep, long-standing relationships with professionals and businesses across the tech landscape allow us to understand their needs intimately. It&rsquo;s this insight - combined with our commitment to Canada&rsquo;s evolving digital economy - that makes our approach so effective.

We build exceptional tech teams

Back to Talent Solutions

 How to spot scams & what to expect from a global recruitment partner 

What is an IT Executive Recruiter? And why your next hire depends on choosing the right one

&nbsp;Harvey Nash&rsquo;s CIO Voices brings together technology leaders to explore the trends, challenges, and opportunities shaping the future of enterprise technology. This month&rsquo;s discussion tackled a topic that many organizations are actively navigating but few have fully mastered: the journey from traditional business intelligence to AI-driven decision-making.
To unpack what that transition really looks like, we spoke with Tad Rhodes, Founder of TownVue, Sanjay Bhutiani, Founder of Dreaming Tree AI, and Craig Leland, Market Director at Harvey Nash. Their perspectives revealed a common theme throughout the discussion: while AI may dominate the headlines, successful machine learning initiatives are rarely about the models themselves. They are about data, architecture, organizational design, and perhaps most importantly, people.
The conversation raised an important question: what does it actually take to operationalize machine learning at scale?
The answer, it turns out, is far more complex than simply adding AI to an existing technology stack.
The Shift from Reporting to Discovery
For years, business intelligence has served as the foundation for enterprise decision-making. Dashboards, reports, and analytics platforms have helped leaders understand what happened, why it happened, and where performance could improve.
But AI introduces a fundamentally different dynamic.
According to Tad Rhodes, the distinction comes down to the difference between presenting information and uncovering insights.
"BI is really about presenting data. It tells you what already happened. AI is more about interrogating it, surfacing the questions you didn't even know you should have been asking."
That observation captures one of the most significant shifts organizations are experiencing today. Traditional BI assumes that humans will interpret information and decide what actions to take. AI changes that relationship by accelerating analysis, identifying patterns automatically, and uncovering opportunities that may never have surfaced through conventional reporting.
Sanjay Bhutiani sees this transition through a slightly different lens. In his view, many organizations believe they are moving toward AI-driven decision-making when, in reality, they are simply layering AI tools onto existing BI environments.
"The honest answer is that most organizations are not really making the transition."
He argues that AI compresses the decision-making loop and fundamentally changes how organizations process information. Systems designed to support executive dashboards are not necessarily designed to support machine learning workflows.
Taken together, their perspectives reveal an important truth. The move from BI to AI is not simply a technology upgrade. It represents a shift from reporting what is known to discovering what is not yet visible.
Why AI Adoption Is More Human Than Technical
One of the strongest themes throughout the discussion was that technology itself is rarely the biggest barrier to AI adoption.
The real challenge is organizational change.
For Rhodes, adoption begins with demonstrating value at an individual level. He described what happens when employees see AI solve a meaningful problem for the first time.
"It's the moment an employee watches AI answer a tough question well, and their eyes of understanding open."
That moment of discovery often changes the conversation entirely. Skepticism gives way to curiosity, and curiosity becomes experimentation. Over time, those small moments of adoption spread across teams and departments.
Bhutiani agrees that culture ultimately determines success, but he believes the challenge runs deeper than individual enthusiasm. Organizations must rethink how they structure teams, measure performance, and reward innovation.
He argues that many enterprises still evaluate technology organizations based on traditional metrics such as uptime, ticket resolution, and project delivery. Yet none of those measurements capture the value AI is intended to create.
Instead, organizations need to focus on outcomes such as decisions accelerated, capacity unlocked, and time recaptured.
Perhaps most importantly, employees must be rewarded for changing how work gets done.
As Bhutiani noted, people are unlikely to redesign their workflows around AI if their performance reviews continue to reward the old way of working.
The technology may be new, but the challenge is a familiar one. Organizations that successfully operationalize AI are often the ones that successfully operationalize change.
The Foundation Beneath Every Successful AI Initiative
If there was one area where contributors aligned most strongly, it was on the importance of data quality, governance, and architecture.
In fact, both Rhodes and Bhutiani argued that these elements ultimately determine the ceiling of what AI can achieve.
Rhodes offered a pragmatic perspective, noting that organizations often become trapped between two extremes. On one side is the pursuit of perfectly clean data. On the other is the reality of messy, incomplete, and inconsistent information.
"Perfectly clean data is a fallacy, but you obviously can't run on a swamp either."
His point is an important one. Successful organizations do not wait until their data is perfect before moving forward. Instead, they focus on creating data that is trustworthy enough to support meaningful decisions.
Bhutiani reinforced this idea from a governance standpoint.
"An organization with mediocre data running sophisticated models will get mediocre outputs, confidently delivered."
It is a warning many leaders need to hear. AI systems can make weak data appear convincing. The sophistication of the model does not compensate for weaknesses in the underlying information.
Governance plays an equally important role. Without clear ownership, auditability, and accountability, machine learning initiatives can quickly create operational and compliance risks that become difficult to manage later.
The organizations succeeding with AI at scale are not treating governance as a final checkpoint. They are treating it as an integral part of the process from the very beginning.
Data Architecture: The Hidden Constraint on AI
While discussions about AI often focus on models, copilots, and automation, our contributors repeatedly returned to a less glamorous topic: data architecture.
Both Rhodes and Bhutiani described architecture as the hidden factor that determines whether AI initiatives accelerate or stall.
Rhodes referred to it as the "silent ceiling."
Organizations often discover this limitation only after investing heavily in AI tools. Data exists across multiple systems, records cannot be connected, and critical information remains trapped in silos.
A customer in a CRM system may appear differently in billing, support, and operational platforms. Without a consistent way to connect those identities, AI lacks the context necessary to generate meaningful insights.
Bhutiani echoed this concern.
"I have watched organizations invest seven or eight figures in AI tooling on top of data architecture that fundamentally cannot support what they are asking it to do."
The result is often predictable. The technology functions correctly, but the outputs remain unreliable because the underlying architecture cannot deliver complete, timely, and connected information.
Three architectural principles emerged repeatedly throughout the discussion:
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Unified rather than siloed data.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Real-time accessibility rather than delayed batch processing.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Structures that allow AI systems to query and reason across information seamlessly.</li>
</ul>
The lesson is clear. AI does not reward organizations that simply possess large amounts of data. It rewards organizations whose data can actually work together.
Centralizing AI Without Slowing Innovation
As AI adoption expands, many leaders face an important question: should AI capabilities be centralized or distributed across the business?
Interestingly, both contributors challenged the framing of the question itself.
For Rhodes, the goal should not be determining who owns AI. The goal should be enabling teams to solve problems.
"Ask, collect, structure, expose."
His approach focuses on understanding what teams need, building the right foundation, and making information accessible without creating unnecessary friction.
He also offered an important observation about so-called shadow AI. Employees often turn to AI tools independently because they are trying to solve real business problems. Rather than viewing this as a threat, organizations should view it as a signal that unmet needs exist.
Bhutiani approached the issue from an enterprise governance perspective.
His recommendation is straightforward: centralize governance, infrastructure, and shared capabilities. Distribute application and innovation.
"The organizations that get this wrong centralize everything and slow themselves down, or distribute everything and accumulate hidden risk."
That balance may ultimately become one of the defining operating models of the AI era. The most effective organizations will likely maintain centralized standards while empowering individual teams to apply AI in ways that create domain-specific value.
Building Teams for the AI Era
The discussion concluded with one of the most pressing questions facing technology leaders today: what does great AI talent actually look like?
The answer depends largely on who you ask.
For Rhodes, curiosity may be the most important hiring characteristic of all.
While technical fundamentals remain important, he believes AI is dramatically accelerating how quickly people can acquire new skills. As a result, individuals who are adaptable, curious, and eager to learn often outperform those relying solely on existing expertise.
"A curious person with the fundamentals can pick up domain context fast and let AI handle the rest."
Bhutiani takes a different but equally compelling view. He places greater emphasis on domain expertise, arguing that technical skills can often be developed faster than deep business understanding.
An engineer who lacks business context may build technically impressive solutions that fail to solve meaningful problems. Conversely, a domain expert who develops technical capabilities can often create solutions that directly impact business outcomes.
The most successful teams, he argues, combine senior technical architects with domain experts who are capable of growing into hybrid roles over time.
Craig Leland added a practical hiring perspective that many organizations would benefit from adopting.
Rather than starting with job descriptions, he encourages organizations to begin by defining outcomes.
"The most common advice I provide to clients is first start by defining the outcomes sought after and not just roles or responsibilities."
He also highlighted a growing challenge in the market. Organizations unfamiliar with AI hiring often add excessive interview stages in an attempt to reduce hiring risk. Unfortunately, this frequently drives away the very candidates they hope to attract.
A clear evaluation process, well-defined objectives, and disciplined decision-making often produce better outcomes than lengthy hiring cycles.
The Real Work of Operationalizing AI
After listening to Rhodes, Bhutiani, and Leland, one conclusion stands out above all others.
Operationalizing machine learning is not primarily a technology challenge.
The organizations creating meaningful value from AI are investing just as heavily in architecture, governance, operating models, talent, and culture as they are in algorithms and tools.
Machine learning succeeds when data is trusted. It succeeds when systems are connected. It succeeds when employees understand how to use it. And it succeeds when organizations align incentives, processes, and people around new ways of working.
The transition from BI to AI is not about replacing dashboards with models. It is about building an environment where intelligence can move from observation to action.
For many organizations, that journey is only beginning.
A huge thank you to Tad Rhodes, Sanjay Bhutiani, and Craig Leland for sharing their perspectives. Their insights continue to make CIO Voices a valuable forum for technology leaders navigating the future of enterprise innovation.

From BI to AI: Operationalizing Machine Learning

As artificial intelligence continues to reshape the hiring landscape, standing out in a competitive job market has never been more challenging or important. In the US tech sector, employers are increasingly relying on Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and AI-driven screening tools to manage high volumes of applications.
While these technologies streamline recruitment, they also raise the bar for job seekers. A well-crafted resume must appeal not only to hiring managers but also to algorithms.
So, what does a great resume look like in 2026? We spoke with Ketzia Woodard, Senior Technical Recruiter, to find out.
1. Keep your resume simple and ATS-friendly
With AI playing a significant role in the hiring process, simplicity is key. Overly designed resumes with complex graphics, columns, and unconventional fonts can confuse screening systems and reduce your chances of progressing.
&ldquo;Right now, because of market changes and the volatility created by AI, I see a lot of jazzy resumes with extra formatting,&rdquo; says Woodard. &ldquo;One of the most important things to keep in mind is to keep it simple.&rdquo;
Use clear headings, standard fonts, and a straightforward layout to ensure your resume is readable by both technology and recruiters.
Top tips:
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3; tab-stops: list .5in;">Use standard fonts such as Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3; tab-stops: list .5in;">Avoid graphics, images, and text boxes.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3; tab-stops: list .5in;">Stick to clear section headings like Experience, Skills, and Education. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3; tab-stops: list .5in;">Submit your resume as a Word document to ensure the recruiter has easy access to edit and copy. </li>
</ul>
2. Showcase recognizable experience, skills, and measurable impact
Well-known organizations can help signal credibility and professional rigor, and hiring managers may use brand recognition as a quick reference point when assessing candidates.
However, brand names aren&rsquo;t the only way to demonstrate value. In-demand technical skills, platforms, and measurable achievements can be just as powerful, especially if you&rsquo;ve worked with widely used tools like Salesforce or delivered meaningful results in smaller or less recognizable organizations.
Leading with a mix of recognizable companies (where applicable), core skills, and clear outcomes helps hiring managers quickly understand the scale, complexity, and relevance of your experience.
This approach also supports ATS optimization, as many systems are designed to identify both employer names and specific skills or technologies.
Your resume should focus on results, not administrative or structural details. Hiring managers are far more interested in what you achieved than how you were contracted or paid.
Whether you worked as a consultant, contractor, or through an LLC, emphasize the client or organization you supported and the value you delivered. Recognizable brands can act as powerful social proof, but they should sit alongside clear evidence of impact.
Remember, hiring managers typically spend very little time reviewing each resume, so it&rsquo;s important to make those moments count by highlighting measurable outcomes and real-world results.
Top tips:
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Highlight well-known companies where relevant, but don&rsquo;t rely on them alone. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Call out key technical skills and platforms (e.g., Salesforce, AWS, Python) prominently. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Lead with the client or company name when possible. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Clearly indicate contract roles with titles such as Senior Project Manager (Contract). </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Quantify achievements with metrics and results. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;">Showcase the scale of your responsibilities, such as budgets, teams, or revenue impact.</li>
</ul>
4. Adopt a skills-first approach &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We find it's best to present your skills and experience to support shaping the best first impression in the hiring process. Presenting your credentials strategically ensures your skills remain the focus. 
We recommend that applicants remove all potential distractions, such as eliminating their graduation dates and early career shifts. After several years in the workforce, what you&rsquo;ve accomplished matters far more than when you earned your degree.
This approach helps position you as current, competitive, and aligned with today&rsquo;s market.
Top tips:
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in;">Omit graduation dates unless you are a recent graduate. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in;">Highlight recent certifications and technical skills.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in;">Focus on achievements from the past 5-10 years. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in;">Ensure your resume reflects modern tools and methodologies. </li>
</ul>
5. Curate your experience for relevance
A resume is not a career history, it&rsquo;s a strategic marketing document. Every line should demonstrate your ability to solve a specific problem for an employer.
Tailor your content to align with the role you&rsquo;re pursuing, prioritizing recent and relevant experience. Removing outdated technologies and redundant information ensures your strengths remain front and center.
As Woodard&rsquo;s insights reinforce, clarity and relevance are essential in a fast-evolving, AI-driven job market.
Top tips:
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in;">Prioritize relevant experience over trying to tailor your resume for every application.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in;">Remove outdated skills and technologies. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in;">Highlight modern tools and methodologies. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in;">Summarize older roles to show career progression without clutter. </li>
</ul>
Stand out and secure your next opportunity
AI is transforming recruitment, but it hasn&rsquo;t replaced the human element. A standout resume in 2026 strikes the right balance between technological optimization and authentic storytelling.
By keeping your resume simple, highlighting credible experience, and focusing on measurable impact, you can position yourself for success in the US tech hiring market.
In an age of algorithms, clarity, relevance, and results remain your greatest competitive advantage.
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Aptos',sans-serif; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: Aptos; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">Ready to take the next step? <a href="https://careers.harveynashusa.com/jobsearch/?_gl=1*1jbpdxp*_ga*NzQ3OTIxMzEzLjE3NTk5MzY3ODc.*_ga_LTK3MRX9GL*czE3NzYyNDYxNTQkbzQxJGcwJHQxNzc2MjQ2MTU0JGo2MCRsMCRoMA..">Explore our current jobs</a> and discover opportunities that match your skills and ambitions.

Top tips to make your resume stand out in the US tech job market

We help companies place visionary leaders across tech disciplines. Backed by a global team of 8,000+, our executive recruitment delivers impact where it matters most.

Executive Search in Tech

Thank you for your exceptional support during the recruitment process for (my) position. Your dedication and professionalism in sourcing candidates was top-notch, and I am genuinely grateful for the quality of individuals you have provided. All of the folks I spoke with were fantastic!

Testimonial 2

Harvey Nash is by far the best supplier I have ever worked with. I have worked with them for over 5 years and they have not dropped the ball once. They are responsive, helpful, and a great partner. They goes above and beyond to help me with program specific questions outside of the day to day duties. And they have done this for me on multiple occasions and on multiple different clients. If it was possible to make clones of Harvey Nash I would make 100 of them. Harvey Nash is awesome!

Testimonial 1

Never experienced a recruiting firm/team like at Harvey Nash, and I&rsquo;ve been in the job market for over 15 years, applied to at least 100 vacancies and worked with over a dozen of recruiters. Thank you Harvey Nash for an amazing experience. If I had to do it again, Harvey Nash or none.

Testimonial 3

I got lucky when Harvey Nash found me after a layoff.&nbsp; I had interviewed with several contractors but felt the best about Harvey Nash.&nbsp; They placed me in a position as a Release Coordinator on a Cybersecurity team.&nbsp; I&rsquo;ve since moved into a position as Project Manager on the Cybersecurity team.

Testimonial 5

Harvey Nash is a great place to work. Honestly, they have HR related topics and processes very well organized from the interview phase all the way down to onboarding, contract management and health insurance not only from the web applications provided but the people behind them.&nbsp; Tom W. and the rest of the team are incredible. They follow up send you emails and call you just to make sure everything is going ok.&nbsp; You don't find many companies that do this. They genuinely care about you.